President Donald Trump overruled a Congressional measure revoking his U.S .- Mexico southern border proclamation of a national crisis. Lawmakers, such as 12 Republicans, had passed the dismissal resolution on Thursday in a surprising condemnation of Mr Trump’s pledge to crack down on illegal immigration. Congress may now need a two – thirds majority to supersede him in both chambers, which is unlikely to happen. This is Mr Trump’s presidency’s first veto.
“As president, I do have the highest duty to protect the country”
Mr Trump said Friday. There were law enforcement officials standing right behind the president, Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, Vice President Mike Pence, Attorney General William Barr and “angel parents”-parents of children killed by undocumented immigrants
“Congress yesterday actually passed a dangerous resolution that would jeopardize countless Americans if it were signed into law.”
Senate has the liberty to pass this resolution and I have the duty to veto it. I’m so proud of vetoing it. “Mr Trump parroted his claims that illegal immigrants from the southern border were mostly criminals bringing drugs into the country. Trump faces anger over the emergency wall plan A massive land grab by Trump He pledged to veto the new resolution ending his declaration of emergency as soon as the measure was disseminated on Capitol Hill.
The Democratic-controlled Legislature passed the resolution last month to repeal the emergency, and on Thursday afternoon twelve Republicans sided with Democratic Senators in a 59-41 vote to crystal clear the Legislature. The renegade conservatives condemned the proclamation of emergency for establishing a bad precedent for a president while emphasizing that they still agreed with Mr Trump
Where it all started?
Mr Trump officially declared the emergency in February after Congress rejected his plea to secure the border for $5.7bn (£ 4.4bn)–a election promise. Through all of this, he has opened full access to billions in military funds which do not require lawmakers ‘ permission. Democrats–and a handful of Republicans–were quick to condemn the overreaching presidential push.
What is next?
The resolution will return to the House after the veto on March 26, said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. While Democrats control the Senate, to supersede Mr Trump’s veto, then they also would need a grand total of 67 votes in the Senate. Since only 12 out of 53 Republicans have agreed to join them in passing the immediate resolution, any supersede measure is unlikely to be successful. “House Republicans must choose between their partisan hypocrisy and sacred oath to protect and defend the constitution,” said Mrs Pelosi in a statement prior to the announcement by Mr Trump.
The Senate Democrat’s top ranking, Chuck Schumer, said in a remark that Mr Trump “seems to have minimal regard for the rule of law and our constitution.” “There’s no emergency; Congress has also agreed to fund its wall several times; Mexico is not going to pay for it, and a bipartisan majority in both chambers has already voted to end its phoney emergency,” he said. US Attorney General William Barr, who was also standing next to Mr Trump as he spoke on Friday, said the emergency order was “clearly authorized by law” and “solidly predicated in law.”
A coalition of 20 states last month, including California and New York, sued Trump’s use of emergency powers, arguing that the president has no authority to divert funds to build a wall along the Mexican border because it is Congress that controls the expenditure.
A dozen defecting Republicans joined Senate Democrats in approving Thursday’s joint resolution, which capped a week of confrontation with the White House as both congressional parties struggled to exercise their power in new ways.
American Civil Liberties Union, which filed one of the cases, said the veto was meaningless-at all in the first place like the statement. Executive Director Anthony Romero said: “Congress rejected the statement made by the President, and now the courts are actually going to be the ultimate arbiter of its legality. “We look want to see him in court and the drubbing that an independent judiciary will receive him.”
Categories: Story Of The Week